I haven't anything in mind right now. But as soon as I have I will add it on
the terminologies page ; )

Adriano Crestani

On 7/28/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/28/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Simon.
> >
> > I just think the terms should be alphabetically listed ; ). And they
> could
> > be tagged with the subproject they are related to, when it's possible.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Adriano Crestani
> >
> > On 7/28/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 7/28/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Great idea Simon, sometimes I get lost with some terminologies : (,
> > this
> > > > will help a lot : )
> > > >
> > > > Adriano Crestani
> > > >
> > > > On 7/28/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I've started a page on the wiki (which everyone in the community
> can
> > > > edit)
> > > > > to capture any terminology that we use for future inclusion in the
> > > > > documentation. The assorted SCA specifications define plenty of
> > > > > terminology
> > > > > and I'm not proposing that that is repeated here. It would be
> > useful,
> > > > > however, to capture any new terms that we use in the Tuscany or
> any
> > > > cases
> > > > > where we have interpreted SCA terminology in a particular way.
> Heres
> > > the
> > > > > link.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Terminology
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > >
> > > > > Simon
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > Hi Adriano,
> > >
> > > If you have more that you come across feel free to add them. Even if
> > there
> > > is a term you don't know the meaning of it's useful to have it
> recorded
> > so
> > > that someone who does know can explain it for us. Also if you don't
> like
> > > what is on the page feel free to provide alternative definitions or
> > terms
> > > and we can then iterate to some form of consensus.
> > >
> > > Simon
> > >
> >
> Ok, good idea, so do you want to add in some SCA, SDO, DAS etc headings/
>
> Simon
>

Reply via email to