+1 from me. I think there's a number of places we could do this type of thing and doing so would help with simplifying things and could help with some of the SPI clean up.
...ant On 8/8/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I just observed that, not all bindings are extending from > AbstractBinding though all implement the interface Binding. The > AbstractBinding class provides an implementation for the Binding > interface and in my opinion should be used by all bindings to avoid > duplication of code that implements the BInding interface. > > I feel the pinch for this now as I am adding a couple of things for > policies and seems a bit odd to go an copy over the same things across > a dozen classes. > > Let me know what people feel about this and I can go and fix all the > bindings for this. > > Thanks. > > - Venkat > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
