On 8/22/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'll start a different thread to discuss the more long term support for > <implementation.web>. > > For now, comments inline to cover the immediate WAR size issue for the > 0.99 release. > > Simon Laws wrote: > [snip] > > 1 - what is in the war that is build from these samples - currently all > of > > the tuscany jars required > > > > > [snip] > > Doing 1 is a relatively straightforward exercise of refactoring the > current > > war into a slimmed down version. I'm still not convinced that it's a > good > > idea to remove the webapp samples and compress everything into a small > > number of samples > > > > I think we should just document how to copy the required JARs to the > Tomcat lib folder and run the stripped down WARs this way, assuming that > it works.
The problem is likely to be the "assuming that it works" as last time i tried this it didn't - there's various classloader issues. Changing to use "deep integration" like we used to also seems like quite a big change to be doing just moments before we cut a release so could we at least postpone looking at that till after this release? For this release I think I'm in favour of just picking a few samples and demos to not ship pre-built and documenting that in their README's as it seems like the most minimal change. ...ant
