OK, it was just a thought. It isn't an exact equivalent. I was
thinking that the ws part is a generic technology and axis2 is a
particular implementation of the generic technology. Similarly ajax
is generic and dwr is specific.
Simon
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
How about binding-ajax-dwr? This seems to go well with binding-ws-axis2.
That seems to contradict what we said before as:
- DWR is a transport protocol (like JSON, another protocol)
- but Axis2 is an implementation.
Simon
Mike Edwards wrote:
+1 to the rename. Best to name the binding by the transport
mechanism involved, not the implementation used to drive it.
Yours, Mike.
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On 8/19/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to rename binding-ajax to binding-dwr, as Ajax is a really
generic term, and it will make clear that this binding is actually
using
the DWR (Direct Web Remoting) protocol.
Thoughts?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
