Beta 2 sounds right given that this is just sync'ing up with SDO version 1.0.
On 9/5/07, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > sounds good to me. > > On 9/6/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Good, looks like we have most (if not all) the updates necessary to > > support SDO 2.1 specification and to be compatible with SDO 1.0 > > release. I'd like to start to work on a new release in the next couple > > days, and if we make it on time, we could still have a chance to > > include DAS in the SCA 1.0 release (planned for middle of September). > > As for naming, I was thinking to make this a beta2 release. Thoughts ? > > > > On 8/27/07, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have attached patch for TUSCANY-961+ TUSCANY-986 combined in > > TUSCANY-961. > > > One observation here - > > > Generated code shows usage of deprecated method > FactoryBase.getProperty > > (Type, > > > int) and needs to be replaced by getLocalProperty(), any changes > needed > > in > > > xsdtojava generator in SDO? > > > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Amita > > > > > > On 8/22/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > With the DAS beta1 release out, I'd like to look forward to things > > > > that we want to do next for DAS. > > > > > > > > I think that there are still couple things that we can improve our > > > > core DAS features, the main one would be adding support for multiple > > > > DAS implementations, and review our SDO 2.1 APIs usage. > > > > > > > > As for our history with SCA integration, we have started efforts > > > > around Data Services/Declarative DAS (implementation.das) and Data > > > > Feeds (implementation.data), and this is probably another area we > > > > would like to continue to work going forward. > > > > > > > > I also think we should continue to improve our user documentation > and > > > > distribution infrastructure to make our release cut easier. > > > > > > > > Below is a summary list of items and JIRAs that are related to these > > > > possible items : > > > > > > > > - TUSCANY-986 - DAS integration with SDO 2.1 APIs > > > > - TUSCANY-961 - DAS: Using deprected SDO method causes Type lookup > > failure > > > > - Refactoring DAS to allow multiple implementatons > > > > > > > > > > > > As for timeframe, maybe it would be good to have a release in the > next > > > > couple weeks, to support SDO 1.0 and be available to the SCA > release, > > > > so we can have the integration story with SCA available. > > > > > > > > This is just of brain dump of where my thinking is at the moment, > I'm > > > > sure everyone has their own thoughts about things we should tackle. > It > > > > would be good to get to them all on the table :-) > > > > > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Luciano Resende > > > > Apache Tuscany Committer > > > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > Apache Tuscany Committer > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >
