On 9/21/07, Simon Nash (JIRA) <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org> wrote: > > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12529426] > > Simon Nash commented on TUSCANY-1784: > ------------------------------------- > > i like the diagram on the Wiki version of the Web site a lot better. I > think there are 3 aspects of Tuscany/SCA that we could illustrate here with > diagrams: > > 1) The assembly model > 2) The distribution model > 3) The extension model for how extensions plug into the Tuscany core > > Ideally this page would have diagrams for all 3 of these. I can update > the diagram that I attached so that it is suitable for 1). We have one for > 2 on the Wiki and we need to figure out how to make it display on the Web > site. I'll have a go at working on one for 3). > > > Picture on SCA Java Web page is confusing > > ----------------------------------------- > > > > Key: TUSCANY-1784 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1784 > > Project: Tuscany > > Issue Type: Bug > > Components: Website > > Environment: All > > Reporter: Simon Nash > > Attachments: assembly.jpg > > > > > > The picture on the SCA Java Web page ( > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sca-java.html) is technically > inaccurate and does not communicate the main value proposition of SCA. In > SCA and Tuscany, each node is in exactly one domain (not shared between > domains as shown), and domains communicate with each other using bindings > (not through a node as shown). > > This picture could be fixed, but even then it would not be the best > showcase for the value proposition of SCA. Something showing recursive > composition and the ability to use multiple bindings would be better. I'm > attaching an example of the kind of thing that I mean. This would need a > bit more tweaking to add the multiple bindings dimension. I can easily do > this if people think it's a good idea. > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Simon
Sounds like a good set to me. Covers the important themes. Without making it too complicated I would like to adjust 2 in some way to show that the assembly in 1 can be distributed across the domain shown in 2. Is this just a matter of additing a component, i.e. a box with service and reference arrows, into each node? Simon
