What if we start be defining some scenarios and concrete test cases before we start making changes on the runtime ? This would probably make things much easier and would help on the integration with existing parts of the runtime. Thoughts ? Let me also think little more overnight and send a more elaborated e-mail tomorrow...
On 9/25/07, shaoguang geng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, every one, > > Suggestion expected. > I keep processing some try on local transaction support. > > I want to find a place to hold a only instance of a TransactionManager in > Tuscany. > > Tuscany uses ExtensionPointRegistries to hold those global instances, so it > seems TM instance should be held the same way. > > TM is going to be used by JavaImplementationInvoker, but its current > structure has no relation to any EPRs. > > > Thanks. > > --------------------------------- > Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links. -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
