On 10/1/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> Interesting question here about which piece of configuration wins. I guess > that if you have gone to the trouble to specify the WSDL over and above > the > intent the WSDL should win.
I agree wsdl should win, that would be consistent with the other binding.wsfunction, for example. if wsdlElement points to a wsdl port then that port location wins over the binding.ws uri attribute location. Actually, I'd go further and say it should be flagged as an error if you specify requires=" transport.jms" and point at a wsdl binding which uses an http transport. ...ant
