good stuff. I'll check it out.

On 05/11/2007, Brady Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just submit the first SCA Native unit test. It's only a simple WSDL
> test, but it's a start :) This commit (svn revision 592062) includes the
> testing infrastructure and an incremental check in of the wsdl tests,
> meaning I have several more wsdl tests coming soon.  I also have some
> composite tests planned to come soon. You'll also need to get svn
> revision 592064 to be able to run the tests from the root source dir.
>
> --------------------
> Brady Johnson
> Lead Software Developer - HydraSCA
> Rogue Wave Software - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pete Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 1:34 AM
> To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Propose] A Tuscany Native release with SCA, SDO and DAS
>
> Up to now we have tried to keep the distros separate so that we could,
> for example, create an SDO release without SCA. I'd like to keep it like
> this.
>
> Cheers,
>
> On 04/11/2007, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Agreed ; )
> >
> > Adriano Crestani
> >
> > On 11/2/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > My thought is that, SCA users might not be using SDO and/or DAS and
> > > vice versa, and if they use, they might have different versions
> > > playing together (e.g SCA X with SDO Y).   This is also the same
> > > pattern we have in the Java side, where SCA, SDO and DAS are
> > > released as separate packages.
> > >
> > > So, considering flexibility, I'd suggest to continue to use the same
>
> > > pattern used on the previous Native Release [1], and have separate
> > > artifacts freleased or each Native sub-project.
> > >
> > > Thoughts ?
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > http://people.apache.org/dist/incubator/tuscany/cpp/1.0-incubator-M3
> > > /win32/
> > >
> > > On 11/1/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Thanks everybody :D
> > > >
> > > > I'm studying right now how is the best way to distribute all the 3
> > > projects
> > > > together. I'm thinking on place all into a root directory and
> > > > merge all
> > > 3
> > > > LICENSE, NOTICE and COPYING on this root directory is enough. I
> > > > thought about a top level build.xml too:
> > > >
> > > > /LICENSE
> > > > /NOTICE
> > > > /COPYING
> > > > /build.xml
> > > > /das
> > > >       INSTALL
> > > >       README
> > > >       build.xml
> > > >       ...
> > > > /sdo
> > > >       INSTALL
> > > >       README
> > > >       build.xml
> > > >       ...
> > > > /sca
> > > >       INSTALL
> > > >       README
> > > >       build.xml
> > > >       ...
> > > >
> > > > Suggestions?
> > > >
> > > > Adriano Crestani
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 11/2/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 from me as well :).  Let me know if you need help with
> anything.
> > > > >
> > > > > - Venkat
> > > > >
> > > > > On 11/1/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Brady has just closed the JIRA-1533, will you be able to add
> > > > > > some
> > > test
> > > > > > cases
> > > > > > for the next release though? Let us know if you will,
> > > > > > otherwise we
> > > > > should
> > > > > > remove the broken sca testcases before the release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Except that, all 3 native projects seems stable and I think we
>
> > > > > > could
> > > go
> > > > > on
> > > > > > preparing a native release. So, I'd like to volunteer for
> > > > > > release
> > > > > manager
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > Tuscany Native Release : )
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thoughs? Suggestions?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Adriano Crestani
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 10/24/07, Brady Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Adriano,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think CPP-M4 is just fine.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I started a Next Release Contents WIKI page [1] sometime
> > > > > > > back for
> > > this
> > > > > > > exact purpose.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Maybe we could Add the SDO and DAS items here.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The items listed for SCA are rather extensive and should
> > > > > > > possibly
> > > be
> > > > > > > reduced unless we can get some additional help.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/SCA+Native+Ne
> > > xt+R
> > > > > > > elease+Contents
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --------------------
> > > > > > > Brady Johnson
> > > > > > > Lead Software Developer - HydraSCA Rogue Wave Software -
> > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > On
> > > > > > > Behalf Of Adriano Crestani
> > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 12:19 AM
> > > > > > > To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Propose] A Tuscany Native release with SCA,
> > > > > > > SDO and
> > > DAS
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cool,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So I created a new release on JIRA: Cpp-M4( not sure if it's
>
> > > > > > > the
> > > best
> > > > > > > name, suggestions? ). We could start to set the JIRAs that
> > > > > > > are
> > > > > supposed
> > > > > > > to be fixed before this release to Cpp-M4 and leave the
> > > > > > > others to Cpp-next.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Suggestions?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Adriano Crestani
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 10/23/07, Simon Nash < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 for this.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >    Simon
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ant elder wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > That would be really good. I'm can't help so much with
> > > > > > > > > coding
> > > but
> > > > > > > > > i'd be happy to help out in any other way.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >    ...ant
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 10/23/07, Adriano Crestani
> > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >>Hi,
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>How about a Tuscany Native release with all native
> projects:
> > > SCA,
> > > > > > > > >>SDO
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > >>DAS?
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>The 3 projects have an Apache Ant build system that is a
>
> > > > > > > > >>good
> > > > > point
> > > > > > > > >>for
> > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > >>release containing all of them.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>SCA next release is being discussed on [1].
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>DAS is ready for its first release, all necessary
> > > > > > > > >>operations
> > > as
> > > > > CRUD
> > > > > > > > it's
> > > > > > > > >>already performing.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>What about SDO, is it ready for a next release?
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>Thoughts? Suggestions?
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>[1]
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg25052.h
> > > > > tml
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>Adriano Crestani
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >><
> > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg25052.h
> > > > > tml
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Luciano Resende
> > > Apache Tuscany Committer
> > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Pete
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
Pete

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to