Yes, that's what I meant.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: How to set a specific data binding to be used by a binding?
On Dec 12, 2007 5:44 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The same interface type can be referenced by many references/services XML
declarations. At this moment, whenever an <interface.xxx> is present in
the
SCDL, we create an instance of XXXInterface. Ideally, we should have a
separate model to capture the representation of an interface type, for
example, JavaInterfaceType for a java interface. The Interface is for the
XML declaration of <interface.xxx> and InterfaceType is for the
underlying
interface type (such as Java interface or WSDL portType).
public interface Interface {
...
InterfaceType getType(); // return the type of the interface
}
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 9:23 AM
Subject: Re: How to set a specific data binding to be used by a binding?
> On Dec 12, 2007 3:23 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'm probably not going to provide enough information to get much of an
>> answer but I'll ask now anyway in case anyone has an obvious answer
right
>> away...
>>
>> Is there a simple way for a binding to say what data binding it wants
>> used?
>>
>> I know there's Interface.resetDataBinding but to use that you need the
>> same
>> Interface object that is used by the DataBindingRuntimeWireProcessor
>> when
>> working out if a transformation is required and that doesn't seem to
>> be
>> the
>> one thats use by the RuntimeComponentReference/Service which is passed
in
>> to
>> a Service or Reference BindingProvider. Even in a simple testcase with
a
>> component using a reference there seems to be about 6 instances of
>> JavaInterface instantiated for the interface class used by the
reference
>> so
>> making sure resetDataBinding is called on the correct one doesn't seem
>> straight forward.
>>
>> ...ant
>>
> Ant
>
> An aside. Any idea why there are so many copies of the interface
> object?
>
> Simon
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So I think you are saying there should be
- a object that represents the interface that can be found in the
contribution - the type
- an object that represents the element <interface.?/> - the declaration
- a relationship between the two.
Simon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
