On Feb 6, 2008 10:23 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>
> On Jan 31, 2008 1:41 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'd like to get some discussion going on what we want to do for
> > graduating to an Apache TLP.
> >
> > The attempt back in November raised issues about diversity and since
> > then it feels like we've just been waiting around hoping diversity would
> > improve. We were unlikely then and we are almost there, would it help to
> > have a target to aim for so we can be a bit more proactive? How about trying
> > again at the April or May board meeting which would give us a two or three
> > full months from now? Having a few months would give us some time to work on
> > turning some of the contributors we already have into committers and to get
> > other committers added to the PPMC, but a few months is also near enough to
> > keep us focused. If we're seen to be working on this it may also encourage
> > some of the contributors we have to be more active and so easier to make
> > committers.
> >
> > There's a lot i think the project could do to encourage others to
> > participate, here's a few things I can think of -
> >
> > We have a lot of downloads and real users, we need to try to get more of
> > these people engaged and contributing, things that may help are:
> >
> > - better documentation, whats there is a bit sparse and our website has
> > started to fall behind and there's quite a few extensions with no or out
> > dated documentation
> > - more publicity about what each new Tuscany release can do, we have
> > lots of new stuff in 1.1 but the only place we say that is in the
> > release notes. The Tuscany blog is a little neglected these days
> > - post to user list as each bit of new function is completed to try to
> > engage users and to show them their comments can make a real difference to
> > what gets in the next release
> > - more timely action on JIRAs, we're getting quite a back log, if we're
> > quick to look at JIRAs it might encourage users to help debug and provide
> > patches
> >
> > Once a user does start contributing I think there are things we could do
> > better on the the dev list to make it easier and to encourage participation:
> >
> > - just generally improve the ML traffic which is at an all time low, if
> > we the active developers don't discuss much then new contributors likely
> > wont either
> > - one reason ML traffic could be down is that discussion is going on
> > off-list instead, is there? Is it really necessary? Lets make a real effort
> > to keep all discussion on the dev list.
> > - more timely replies in discussions. if someone replies to a thread
> > often it ends up with people waiting for a follow-up reply, if that
> > follow-up takes ages to come the discussion can stall and people loose
> > interest and move on to something else.
> > - we may need to provide more active help to contributors when they make
> > suggestions, not just ask if they'd implement it but at least provide lots
> > of detail about how they could do it or even step up and help code even if
> > we may not think its the most useful thing
> >
> > What do others think, would any of those things help? Any other
> > suggestions that could help improve our diversity? Does aiming for the April
> > board meet sound ok or too soon or too far?
> >
> >    ...ant
> >
> >
> I've gone through everything suggested so far in this thread and added all
> the points to a wiki page -
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Graduation+Next+Steps.
> I've probably missed some and there are some duplicate points, feel free to
> edit the page.
>
> So what to do with this? Some of the points are a bit vague, some we may
> not all agree with, some are easy for one person to action if we agree,
> others need more of a group effort.
>
> Documentation
>
>
> How about trying to prioritize this by people posting their top three, see
> if there's much overlap with whats posted and trying to resolve those first?
>

Oops, hit enter and gmail sent this while still composing my thoughts sorry
:(

   ...ant

Reply via email to