[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12566505#action_12566505
 ] 

Amita Vadhavkar commented on TUSCANY-1835:
------------------------------------------

Please give more details,what constraints apply, what investigation led to 
conclusion about "appinfo". Thanks

> XSDHelper.getAppinfo() returns wrong result
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TUSCANY-1835
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1835
>             Project: Tuscany
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Java SDO Implementation
>    Affects Versions: Java-SDO-1.0
>         Environment: WinXP
>            Reporter: Fuhwei Lwo
>            Assignee: Fuhwei Lwo
>             Fix For: Java-SDO-Next
>
>         Attachments: 1835.patch
>
>
> According to SDO 2.1 spec section 3.13 (The getAppinfo() methods return the 
> XML, starting from the specified source element.).  This means if we have an 
> annotation defined like below.
> <xsd:annotation>
>       <xsd:appinfo source="appinfosrc">
>               <simple:stockQuote xmlns:simple="http://www.example.com/simple";>
>                       <symbol>fbnt</symbol>
>               </simple:stockQuote>
>       </xsd:appinfo>
> </xsd:annotation>
> XSDHelper.getAppinfo() should return
> <xsd:appinfo source="appinfosrc">
>       <simple:stockQuote xmlns:simple="http://www.example.com/simple";>
>               <symbol>fbnt</symbol>
>       </simple:stockQuote>
> </xsd:appinfo>
> Now it's returning the wrong result like below.
>       <simple:stockQuote xmlns:simple="http://www.example.com/simple";>
>               <symbol>fbnt</symbol>
>       </simple:stockQuote>

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to