I meant to say: "Given my view I don't see it's relevance ON THE CLIENT SIDE"
On Feb 20, 2008 2:32 PM, Scott Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Responses inline...thanks > > > > > > > > > OK, I guess I didn't understand what you did after all. > > > > > > I'm not sure why we are looking at the client side and the reference > > > binding invoker? Is there even > > > a chain we care about on the client side? Doesn't the chain consist > > > of a path from client->binding? > > > > There is an invocation chain for the client --> reference binding. If the > > reference binding allows pass-by-reference, then we don't have to copy the > > data on the client side. There might be some reference binding types (for > > example, some in-memory transport) that will expose the data by reference. > > I wonder if our disconnect here is that you view this allowsPBR flag > as potentially having > some other application whereas I'm viewing it in a less-general manner > in which all it says is: > "I know this chain doesn't need a PBVI copy". Given my view I don't > see it's relevance. > > > > So I could see some service binding impls, knowing that a copy was > > > done by the binding, turning off the PBVInterceptor. > > > I was suggesting that the service binding might not know this > > > statically, but might know dynamically that the PBV copy does or > > > doesn't need to be done. I wasn't thinking of using the Message, or > > > anything Tuscany-related necessarily, to make this > > > determination. > > > > So you're looking for Message to determine if the flag should be true or > > false, right? > > If you're asking do I want to look at the Message from the service > binding provider, in order to > determine whether I want to do the PBVI.copy or not on the chain from > the binding to the impl, > then my answer is "no". > > Since I'm writing a service listener I'm not counting on having a > Tuscany Message and so wasn't > trying to solve the problem of how I'd know. > > If, instead, you're asking if I want to be able to use the Message to > carry the decision that I want the service > binding provider to make of whether or not to do the copy, then I'm > not sure. I thought the smallest > change on top of what you already started would be to add a setting to > the chain itself. > > But, like my first comment shows... maybe I didn't catch the scope of > your intent. > > Scott > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
