Hi,

A really picky point but there is a spelling mistake in the text. The text
has two 't's on the word project:

   "establish a Projectt Management Committee charged"


Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 29 February 2008 20:06
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Change Tuscany Charter to remove SDO reference

kelvin goodson wrote:
> Please vote to alter the wording of the existing draft Tuscany charter as
> discussed in
> 
>
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200802.mbox/%3c9deac
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> to the following ....
> 
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
>  interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's
>  purpose to establish a Projectt Management Committee charged with the
> creation
>  and maintenance of open-source software for distribution at no charge
>  to the public, that simplifies the development, deployment and management
>  of distributed applications built as compositions of service components.
>  These components may be implemented with a range of technologies and
>  connected using a variety of communication protocols. This software will
>  implement relevant open standards including, but not limited to, the
>  SCA standard defined by the OASIS OpenCSA member section, and related
>  technologies.
> 
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
>  Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Tuscany Project",
>  be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
>  Foundation; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Tuscany Project be and hereby is
>  responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
>  related to Apache Tuscany;
>  and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Tuscany" be
>  and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
>  serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
>  of the Apache Tuscany Project, and to have primary responsibility
>  for management of the projects within the scope of
>  responsibility of the Apache Tuscany Project; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
>  hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
>  Apache Tuscany Project:
> 
>      Adriano Crestani            <adrianocrestani at apache dot org>
>      Andrew Borley               <ajborley at apache dot org>
>      ant elder                       <antelder at apache dot org>
>      Brady Johnson              <bjohnson at apache dot org>
>      Frank Budinsky             <frankb at apache dot org>
>      Ignacio Silva-Lepe          <isilval at apache dot org>
>      Jean-Sebastien Delfino   <jsdelfino at apache dot org>
>      kelvin goodson               <kelvingoodson at apache dot org>
>      Luciano Resende           <lresende at apache dot org>
>      Mike Edwards               <edwardsmj at apache dot org>
>      Pete Robbins                <robbinspg at apache dot org>
>      Raymond Feng              <rfeng at apache dot org>
>      Simon Laws                  <slaws at apache dot org>
>      Simon Nash                  <nash at apache dot org>
>      Venkata Krishnan          <svkrish at apache dot org>
>      Mark Combellack           <mcombellack at apache dot org>
> 
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Ant Elder
>  be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Tuscany, to
>  serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
>  Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
>  death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
>  or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Tuscany Project be and hereby
>  is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
>  Incubator Tuscany podling; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
>  Incubator Tuscany podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
>  Project are hereafter discharged.
> 

+1 from me to remove the SDO reference (and Thanks for your answers and 
clarifications in the related DISCUSS thread [1]).

However, this VOTE thread introduces other unrelated changes to the 
charter. Would you mind restarting a new VOTE thread for the SDO change 
alone? I think it'll be easier to track things if we vote on individual 
changes separately.

Thanks.

[1] http://marc.info/?t=120369825100001&r=1&w=2
-- 
Jean-Sebastien

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to