Hi,
Since Google has extended the deadline for applications for another one
week, I did some modifications to the proposal.[1] I did not do any major
modifications to the content, but I did some slight changes to the schedule.
Hopefully this will be the final proposal. But your ideas and comments are
gladly welcome.

I would like to thank the Tuscany community for their help and guidance from
the beginning. Those suggestions were really helpful me to improve my
proposal.

thanks!

best regards,
/thilina

[1]
http://wiki.apache.org/general/ThilinaBuddhika/GSoC2008/Tuscany_SCA_Support_in_the_Geronimo_Admin_Console

On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Thilina Buddhika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> First of all, I would like to thank the tuscany community for the massive
> support given me to improve my proposal. I applied the modifications
> recommended in this thread. I updated the wiki page[1] and the Google Web
> App.
>
> Hopefully this will be the finalized proposal. But your ideas and comments
> are gladly welcome, since we have few more hours to wrap up.
>
> thanks!
>
> /thilina
>
> [1] -
> http://wiki.apache.org/general/ThilinaBuddhika/GSoC2008/Tuscany_SCA_Support_in_the_Geronimo_Admin_Console
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Thilina Buddhika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jean-Sebastien,
> >
> > thanks a lot for the feedback. Absolutely it is really helpful. I'll
> > work on the improvements suggested by you.
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> > /thilina
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:49 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Thilina Buddhika wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I have done some slight modifications to the proposal. I will keep
> > > on
> > > > improving it in next two days, as I am getting more feedback from
> > > the
> > > > community and I am digging more into Tuscany and Geronimo.
> > > >
> > > > I submitted it as a proposal for GSoC. I will keep the Apache wiki
> > > page [1]
> > > > up to date with the modifications I will be doing to the proposal,
> > > so that
> > > > everyone can review it.
> > > >
> > > > thanks!
> > > >
> > > > / thilina
> > > >
> > > > [1] -
> > > >
> > > http://wiki.apache.org/general/ThilinaBuddhika/GSoC2008/Tuscany_SCA_Support_in_the_Geronimo_Admin_Console
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hi Thilina,
> > >
> > > The proposal looks really good to me! I just have a few minor comments
> > > and ideas.
> > >
> > > An SCA domain contains the following:
> > > - SCA contributions
> > > - a domain composite configuring and assembling top level SCA
> > > components
> > > - policy configuration
> > > - an allocation of SCA components to nodes/runtimes
> > >
> > > An SCA domain admin application should ideally cover these four
> > > aspects.
> > > I'll let you think about how you want to stage them in the project.
> > >
> > > A comment on "an SCA domain is hosted on an application server runtime
> > > like Geronimo". Although a "domain admin application" can be hosted on
> > > a
> > > single app server like Geronimo, an SCA domain is wider than a single
> > > runtime, as SOA solutions usually involve more than a single central
> > > JEE
> > > server :), with components distributed on multiple runtimes in a
> > > network
> > > (Geronimo, Tomcat, standalone Tuscany, other app servers etc.).
> > >
> > > So for a simple and friendly user experience, the domain administrator
> > > should be able to deploy, validate, start/stop components running on
> > > other runtimes in the domain, directly from your Geronimo-based admin
> > > application, without having to juggle with the other admin
> > > applications
> > > of the individual servers. I think that it will really make a big
> > > difference in terms of usability.
> > >
> > > Hope this helps.
> > > --
> > > Jean-Sebastien
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to