On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 1:35 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've spent all morning reviewing this and its looking pretty good but > > i've > > just hit this NoClassDefFoundError when running the calculator sample > > with > > mvn from an empty local mvn repository: > > > > Running calculator.CalculatorTestCase > > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.907 > > sec > > <<< FAILURE! > > testCalculator(calculator.CalculatorTestCase) Time elapsed: 0.875 sec > > <<< > > ERROR! > > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/jws/WebService > > at > > > > org.apache.tuscany.sca.interfacedef.java.jaxws.JAXWSJavaInterfaceProcessor.visitInterface(JAXWSJavaInterfaceProcessor.java:70) > > > > ...ant > > > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > The RC3a is now available in [1]. Please give it a quick try, and I'll > > > call a vote in the morning. > > > > > > [1] > > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/sca-1.2-RC3a/<http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende/tuscany/sca-1.2-RC3a/> > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende/tuscany/sca-1.2-RC3a/> > > > > > > -- > > > Luciano Resende > > > Apache Tuscany Committer > > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende<http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende>< > > http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > I haven't got to the stage where I can try and recreate this as I'm having > other maven problems (which I hope are local to me). A long shot as this > doesn't look maven related but is this this inconsistent pom thing again > [1]? > > Simon > > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg27383.html > I got past my local problems an sample/calculator runs from maven for me with just the tuscany part of the repo cleaned. Am currently doing a full build of the src distro with a completely clear repo so I'll see if that throws anything up. It'll take some time though. I the mean time I noticed another couple of LICENSE funnies. src/LICENSE The wrong version of the SDO license was present I neglected to add the w3c license for which I added a NOTICE entry yesterday. bin/LICENSE The dojotoolkit is mentioned without a version number The axion module is mentioned twice against different licenses. We missed this as the second mention doesn't refer to a jar or version number. I assume that the first mention (with the full version number) is correct and have removed the second. I've checked in fixes for these into the branch. Simon Simon
