Anyone likely to have any time to take a look at this? If its possible to do something to fix this it would be good to try to get it done in the 1.1.1 release.
...ant ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Eric S Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 5:03 PM Subject: Re: Using Tuscany Java SDO with EMF 2.4 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frank, Sorry for the delay in getting back to you, I got busy with some other stuff that had to be done yesterday. I've been debugging the problem all morning, and it seems to come down to a NullPointerException from eStaticClass() in ReferenceImpl. Here's the code where I'm seeing the exception: *protected* EClass eStaticClass() { * return* SDOPackage.*eINSTANCE*.getReference(); } SDOPackage.eINSTANCE is null, so SDOPackageImpl.init() is returning null for some reason. I'm not sure that really answers your question, but I hope it's helpful. Thanks, Eric [image: Inactive hide details for Frank Budinsky ---04/15/2008 04:28:04 PM---Eric, Theoretically EMF 2.4 should work, because it's supp]Frank Budinsky ---04/15/2008 04:28:04 PM---Eric, Theoretically EMF 2.4 should work, because it's supposed to be backward From: Frank Budinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 04/15/2008 04:28 PM Subject: Re: Using Tuscany Java SDO with EMF 2.4 ------------------------------ Eric, Theoretically EMF 2.4 should work, because it's supposed to be backward compatible. Have you tracked down exactly what class is missing and why? Frank. Eric S Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/15/2008 03:36:49 PM: > David, > > EMF 2.2.3 is what I've been using also up until this point. My code > is integrating with a project that's already using EMF 2.4, so I > need to align with the larger project. Based on what I've seen so > far, it doesn't look like that's a possibility. > > > Thanks, > Eric > [image removed] "David Adcox" ---04/15/2008 03:10:11 PM---The latest > version I've been using is 2.2.3 - which I believe is what is > currently specified in the > > [image removed] > From: > > [image removed] > "David Adcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [image removed] > To: > > [image removed] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [image removed] > Date: > > [image removed] > 04/15/2008 03:10 PM > > [image removed] > Subject: > > [image removed] > Re: Using Tuscany Java SDO with EMF 2.4 > > > > > The latest version I've been using is 2.2.3 - which I believe is what > is currently specified in the pom files. Is there a reason you need > to use a newer version of EMF? > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Eric S Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > Has anyone had any success running Java SDO with EMF 2.4? I'm running into > > a NoClassDefFoundError on SDOUtil.createHelperContext(). I've seen this on > > both the 1.0 and 1.1 releases. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Eric > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]