[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12593614#action_12593614 ]
Gilbert Kwan commented on TUSCANY-2289: --------------------------------------- Q 2. protected/private field but its setter is public - there should be no injection, too Ans: No, the property should be injected in this case. I tested the above, where the non-public field is not injected by its public setter. > Java runtime should inject property into an unannotated non-public field by > public setter > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: TUSCANY-2289 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2289 > Project: Tuscany > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Java SCA Core Runtime > Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next > Reporter: Gilbert Kwan > Assignee: Simon Laws > Fix For: Java-SCA-Next > > > Java Common Annotations and APIs v1.0 - Sec 1.8.13: > 1349 Properties may also be injected via public setter methods even when the > @Property annotation is not > 1350 present. However, the @Property annotation must be used in order to > inject a property onto a non-public > 1351 field. In the case where there is no @Property annotation, the name of > the property is the same as the > 1352 name of the field or setter. > Currently the properties are injected into unannotated protected fields too. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.