Raymond Feng wrote:
>To improve the Tuscany databinding framework for simplicity and
>flexibility, I come out a list of potential TODOs. Your
>feedback/ideas/help will be very welcome.
Being a developer, I may be biased towards items that make the
developer's life a bit easier, so I tend to favor ease of use over new
features. Given that, here are 3 I would vote for:
> * Refine/simplify the databinding SPIs (for better extensibility and
> consumeablity)
> * Better support for collective/aggregate data types such as
> java.util.Collection
> * Support annotations of a java type (for example, an InputStream can
> be used to contain different formats of data) to further constrain
the > data type (We could use the JAXB annotation for this purpose)
Additionally, I think the following item is well-worth the effort to
popularize Tuscany and make it easier to adopt and implement.
> * More and better documents
--
Thanks, Dan Becker
