[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2277:
-----------------------------------------
Attachment: (was: TUSCANY-2277-Part1-New.patch)
> Standardization of registering msg with monitor
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-2277
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2277
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java SCA Assembly Model
> Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
> Environment: Windows XP
> Reporter: Ramkumar Ramalingam
> Assignee: Simon Laws
> Fix For: Java-SCA-Next
>
> Attachments: TUSCANY-2277-Part1.patch, TUSCANY-2277-Part2.patch,
> TUSCANY-2277-Part3.patch
>
>
> Lokking at the monitors that are being hooked up with different parts of the
> code, found that we have some inconsistency interms of raising warning &
> errors. In some places we throw exceptions and in other places we raise a
> warning.
>
> Here are some examples for the inconsistency.......
>
> BaseConfigurationBuilderImpl.java
> Here we raise only a warning for URISyntaxException, should we not throw an
> exception too?
>
> BaseWireBuilderImpl.java
> Here we throw exceptions for IncompatibleInterfaceContractException, don't
> you think we also need to register this message in our monitor?
> In the same class, we raise a warning message for the PolicyRelated
> Exceptions, should we also throw an exception here?
>
> CompositeProcessor.java
> There are instances where we throw new ContributionReadException, i believe
> registering this msg with a monitor is also required as this is caused by
> incorrect user input.
> From Simon's comments on how we can go ahead with handling such instance, we
> will fix the issue as discussed....
> http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg30994.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
