Did you try mvn -U ? On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:18 AM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Luciano, > yes, I added that workaround, and that satisfied most of the EMF jars, > but not these two. It's odd, the 2 jars we need are there in the repository > you suggested, but maven will not download them. > > Kelvin. > > 2008/6/6 Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Did you try the workaround I mentioned before on this thread [1] where >> I added a new repository ? It was actually for other jars, but might >> help in this case as well... >> >> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg31727.html >> >> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:56 AM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > I've made all the changes required in the tag [1] to get rid of the felix >> > jars, find and include the emf jars, and I've removed the incubating >> tag, >> > DISCLAIMER files etc. However, I'm currently stumped as to why two emf >> > jars available [2] and [3] don't get downloaded by the build. The build >> > output complains about URLs that, if cut and pasted into a browser, work >> > fine. Any clues to explain this odd maven behaviour are welcome. >> > >> > Kelvin >> > >> > >> > [1] >> > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1.1-RC2/ >> > [2] >> > >> http://ftp.ussg.iu.edu/eclipse/modeling/emf/emf/maven2/org/eclipse/emf/codegen/2.2.3/ >> > [3] >> > >> http://ftp.ussg.iu.edu/eclipse/modeling/emf/emf/maven2/org/eclipse/emf/codegen-ecore/2.2.3/ >> > >> > 2008/6/3 Rajini Sivaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > >> >> Kelvin, >> >> >> >> Sorry about the delay in getting back to you - I can see that you have >> >> found >> >> a solution. Yes, you are absolutely right, the felix framework should >> use >> >> scope "provided" since SdoBundleActivator is only used when SDO is >> running >> >> inside an OSGi container, and the framework classes are provided by the >> >> container. >> >> >> >> >> >> On 6/3/08, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Just a thought, would I be right in guessing that if ever our >> >> > SdoBundleActivator is touched in the runtime, then the environment >> would >> >> > be >> >> > expected to provide the classes to satisfy >> >> > >> >> > import org.osgi.framework.BundleActivator; >> >> > import org.osgi.framework.BundleContext; >> >> > >> >> > ? >> >> > >> >> > in which case I think declaring a "provided" scope for the felix >> >> dependency >> >> > would be the right way to do things >> >> > >> >> > Kelvin. >> >> > >> >> > 2008/6/3 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > >> >> > > Thanks Ant, that looks like progress, but the felix framework jar >> is >> >> > now >> >> > > not in the list of distributed jars. >> >> > > >> >> > > Kelvin. >> >> > > >> >> > > 2008/6/3 ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > > >> >> > > Adding an exclude for felix to the distribution pom can fix that, eg >> >> > here's >> >> > >> local changes i have just tried: >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Index: src/main/assembly/bin.xml >> >> > >> =================================================================== >> >> > >> --- src/main/assembly/bin.xml (revision 662488) >> >> > >> +++ src/main/assembly/bin.xml (working copy) >> >> > >> @@ -120,13 +120,13 @@ >> >> > >> <dependencySets> >> >> > >> <dependencySet> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> <outputDirectory>tuscany-sdo-${sdo.version}/lib</outputDirectory> >> >> > >> - <includes> >> >> > >> - >> >> > >> <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:tuscany-sdo-api-r2.1</include> >> >> > >> + <!-- includes> >> >> > >> + >> >> > >> <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:tuscany-sdo-api-r2.1</include> >> >> > >> >> >> > <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:tuscany-sdo-lib</include> >> >> > >> >> >> > <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:tuscany-sdo-impl</include> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:tuscany-sdo-tools</include> >> >> > >> >> <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:sample-sdo</include> >> >> > >> - </includes> >> >> > >> + </includes --> >> >> > >> <fileMode>0644</fileMode> >> >> > >> </dependencySet> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Index: pom.xml >> >> > >> =================================================================== >> >> > >> --- pom.xml (revision 662488) >> >> > >> +++ pom.xml (working copy) >> >> > >> @@ -56,6 +56,12 @@ >> >> > >> <groupId>org.apache.tuscany.sdo</groupId> >> >> > >> <artifactId>tuscany-sdo-impl</artifactId> >> >> > >> <version>${pom.version}</version> >> >> > >> + <exclusions> >> >> > >> + <exclusion> >> >> > >> + <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId> >> >> > >> + <artifactId>org.apache.felix.main</artifactId> >> >> > >> + </exclusion> >> >> > >> + </exclusions> >> >> > >> </dependency> >> >> > >> <dependency> >> >> > >> <groupId>org.apache.tuscany.sdo</groupId> >> >> > >> @@ -67,6 +73,7 @@ >> >> > >> <artifactId>sample-sdo</artifactId> >> >> > >> <version>${pom.version}</version> >> >> > >> </dependency> >> >> > >> + >> >> > >> </dependencies> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> <build> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Which results in a lib directory containing: >> >> > >> >> >> > >> backport-util-concurrent-3.0.jar >> >> > >> codegen-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> codegen-ecore-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> common-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> ecore-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> ecore-change-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> ecore-xmi-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> sample-sdo-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar >> >> > >> stax-api-1.0.1.jar >> >> > >> tuscany-sdo-api-r2.1-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar >> >> > >> tuscany-sdo-impl-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar >> >> > >> tuscany-sdo-lib-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar >> >> > >> tuscany-sdo-tools-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar >> >> > >> wstx-asl-3.2.1.jar >> >> > >> xsd-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> >> >> > >> ...ant >> >> > >> >> >> > >> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:31 AM, kelvin goodson < >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > I had an offline chat with Rajini. It seems we need just the >> >> > framework >> >> > >> jar >> >> > >> > of felix in the distro, but if the dependency on felix is >> declared >> >> as >> >> > >> test >> >> > >> > scope in the pom, then that jar is not available to main phase >> of >> >> the >> >> > >> > build. If its not declared as test scope then we get 5 felix >> jars >> >> in >> >> > >> the >> >> > >> > binary distro. Rajini's going to take a look when she gets some >> >> time. >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > Kelvin. >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > 2008/6/3 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> The felix jars were introduced in the fix for "SDO does not >> work >> >> > with >> >> > >> >> OSGi" [1] in commit 620763 [2]. I don't know if this is >> expected >> >> > >> >> behaviour, not being an OSGI expert. Comments anyone? >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> Kelvin. >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293 >> >> > >> >> [2] http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=620763 >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> 2008/6/3 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> The required libraries are >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> sample-sdo-%RELEASE%.jar >> >> > >> >>> sdo-api-r2.1-%RELEASE%.jar >> >> > >> >>> tuscany-sdo-lib-%RELEASE%.jar >> >> > >> >>> tuscany-sdo-impl-%RELEASE%.jar >> >> > >> >>> tuscany-sdo-tools-%RELEASE%.jar >> >> > >> >>> codegen-ecore-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> >>> codegen-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> >>> ecore-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> >>> ecore-change-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> >>> ecore-xmi-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> >>> common-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> >>> xsd-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> >>> stax-api-1.0.1.jar >> >> > >> >>> wstx-asl-3.2.0.jar >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> with >> >> > >> >>> backport-util-concurrent being optional if you want threadsafe >> >> > >> >>> collections with Java 1.4 IIRC >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> The felix jar inclusions were introduced some time between >> commit >> >> > >> level >> >> > >> >>> 600913 and 627754; I'm working on narrowing this down at the >> >> > moment. >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> Kelvin. >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> 2008/6/2 ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> It is strange. >> >> > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> Removing the <includes> at the bottom of the assembly bin.xml >> >> > changes >> >> > >> it >> >> > >> >>>> so >> >> > >> >>>> that the dependencies do get included again, but several felix >> >> > >> >>>> dependencies >> >> > >> >>>> also get dragged in. What is the complete list of jars that >> >> should >> >> > be >> >> > >> >>>> included? >> >> > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> ...ant >> >> > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:02 PM, kelvin goodson < >> >> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > >> >>>> wrote: >> >> > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> > This failure also occurs with the 2.1 version and the >> >> 2.2-beta-1 >> >> > >> >>>> version. >> >> > >> >>>> > The current trunk version is 2.2-beta-3-SNAPSHOT, which I >> >> > haven't >> >> > >> >>>> found in >> >> > >> >>>> > a repository yet, so the only version that seems ever to >> have >> >> > >> worked >> >> > >> >>>> is >> >> > >> >>>> > the >> >> > >> >>>> > 2.2-SNAPSHOT version. I have taken a look at the assembly >> >> plugin >> >> > >> >>>> JIRAs, >> >> > >> >>>> > but >> >> > >> >>>> > it's hard to trawl that since so many JIRAs reference the >> word >> >> > >> >>>> dependency. >> >> > >> >>>> > It's not clear to me whether we benefited from a freak bug >> that >> >> > was >> >> > >> to >> >> > >> >>>> our >> >> > >> >>>> > advantage in the 2.2-SNAPSHOT version or whether all the >> other >> >> > >> >>>> versions >> >> > >> >>>> > have >> >> > >> >>>> > a bug/bugs. >> >> > >> >>>> > >> >> > >> >>>> > Kelvin. >> >> > >> >>>> > >> >> > >> >>>> > 2008/6/2 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > >> >>>> > >> >> > >> >>>> > > I have pinned down the change that caused the absence of >> EMF >> >> > jars >> >> > >> in >> >> > >> >>>> the >> >> > >> >>>> > > distribution zip to be the switch from the maven assembly >> >> > plugin >> >> > >> >>>> version >> >> > >> >>>> > > 2.2-SNAPSHOT to the 2.2-beta-2 as altered here [1]. I >> hope >> >> > to >> >> > >> >>>> look at >> >> > >> >>>> > > this again soon, but have to stop for now. If anyone has >> >> any >> >> > >> views >> >> > >> >>>> on >> >> > >> >>>> > what >> >> > >> >>>> > > version we should be using please pipe up. >> >> > >> >>>> > > >> >> > >> >>>> > > Kelvin. >> >> > >> >>>> > > >> >> > >> >>>> > > [1] >> >> > >> >>>> > > >> >> > >> >>>> > >> >> > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml?r1=628691&r2=642349&pathrev=642349&diff_format=h >> >> > >> >>>> > > >> >> > >> >>>> > > Kelvin. >> >> > >> >>>> > > >> >> > >> >>>> > > 2008/5/19 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > >> >>>> > > >> >> > >> >>>> > > I'm looking at fixing a problem wrt running the samples at >> >> the >> >> > >> >>>> moment. >> >> > >> >>>> > >> >> >> > >> >>>> > >> Also, I found that with a combination of using IBM JDK >> 1.5 >> >> and >> >> > >> >>>> maven >> >> > >> >>>> > 2.0.7 >> >> > >> >>>> > >> I got hit by >> >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-135when >> >> > >> >>>> trying >> >> > >> >>>> > to >> >> > >> >>>> > >> build from the top. We say in our BUILDING doc that >> 2.0.7 >> >> is >> >> > >> OK, >> >> > >> >>>> > perhaps >> >> > >> >>>> > >> if we need to respin we should raise that in order to >> avoid >> >> > IBM >> >> > >> JDK >> >> > >> >>>> > users >> >> > >> >>>> > >> hitting this issue. It's fine with 2.0.9 >> >> > >> >>>> > >> >> >> > >> >>>> > >> Kelvin. >> >> > >> >>>> > >> >> >> > >> >>>> > >> >> >> > >> >>>> > >> 2008/5/18 ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > >> >>>> > >> >> >> > >> >>>> > >> Please review and vote on the SDO 1.1.1 release. >> >> > >> >>>> > >>> >> >> > >> >>>> > >>> The artifacts including binary and source distributions, >> >> > >> staging >> >> > >> >>>> maven >> >> > >> >>>> > >>> repo >> >> > >> >>>> > >>> and release notes are available at >> >> > >> >>>> > >>> >> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/> >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/> >> >> < >> >> > http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/> >> >> > >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/> >> >> > >> >>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/> >> >> > >> >>>> > < >> http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/> >> >> > >> >>>> > >>> < >> >> http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/ >> >> > >. >> >> > >> >>>> > >>> The only difference between this and the 1.1 release is >> the >> >> > fix >> >> > >> >>>> for >> >> > >> >>>> > >>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2240. >> >> > >> >>>> > >>> >> >> > >> >>>> > >>> +1 from me. >> >> > >> >>>> > >>> >> >> > >> >>>> > >>> ...ant >> >> > >> >>>> > >>> >> >> > >> >>>> > >> >> >> > >> >>>> > >> >> >> > >> >>>> > > >> >> > >> >>>> > >> >> > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Thank you... >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> Rajini >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Luciano Resende >> Apache Tuscany Committer >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >> >
-- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
