Shouldn't be a big problem. We can get rid of those commented ones from
code as soon as we find them.
++Vamsi
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that you need to improve the script to filter out the @Ignore
> annotations in the java comments :-).
>
> For example,
> // @Ignore
> // @Ignore("TUSCANY-2349")
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Kevin Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:26 PM
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Good practice for disabling/ignoring failing test cases
>
> Since the vtest script assumes a test comment structure around
>> specification line numbers, I created a new script specific to this
>> purpose and added it to /java/etc. It scans for files named
>> *testCase.java and collects methods annotated with @Ignore.
>>
>> I could use some help getting this automated but, in the meantime,
>> I'll run this scan weekly and post results to the dev-list
>>
>> Here is output from tonight's scan:
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Content generated by from C:/tuscanysvn/java/sca
>> Test case files scanned 2008-06-11 (svn:Revision: 663374)
>> * Total files processed = 591
>> * Total ingnored test cases = 26
>>
>> The following test cases have ignored test methods ...
>>
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.itest.databindings.jaxb.DatabindingTestCase
>> testWSMap() , no associated jira
>> testWSHashMap() , no associated jira
>>
>>
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.itest.databindings.jaxb.PrimitivesDatabindingTestCase
>> testSCANegateByteArray() , T-2351
>> testWSNegateByteArray() , T-2349
>>
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.itest.references.ManualWiredReferenceTestCase
>> testD2Reference() , no associated jira
>>
>> client.CatalogEJBClientTestCase
>> testCatalogEJB() , no associated jira
>>
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.vtest.assembly.ctypefile.CompomnentTypeFileTestCase
>> typeFile3() , T-2383
>>
>>
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.vtest.javaapi.annotations.conversationattributes.ConversationAttributesAnnotationTestCase
>> singlePrincipal() , no associated jira
>>
>>
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.vtest.javaapi.annotations.property.PropertyAnnotationTestCase
>> atProperty7() , T-2289
>>
>>
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.vtest.javaapi.annotations.reference.ReferenceAnnotationTestCase
>> bogusComponentName() , no associated jira
>>
>>
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.vtest.javaapi.annotations.scope.ScopeAnnotationTestCase
>> atScope1() , T-2274
>> atScope7() , no associated jira
>>
>>
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.vtest.javaapi.apis.componentcontext.ComponentContextTestCase
>> testGetRequestContext() , no associated jira
>> testServiceLookup() , no associated jira
>>
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.vtest.javaapi.apis.exception.ExceptionTestCase
>> testServiceUnavailableException() , no associated jira
>>
>>
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.vtest.javaapi.apis.requestcontext.RequestContextTestCase
>> testGetSecuritySubject() , no associated jira
>>
>>
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.vtest.javaapi.conversation.callback.CallbackTestCase
>> statefulMixedCallback() , T-2291
>> statelessCallback3() , T-2306
>> customCallback() , T-2312
>>
>>
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.vtest.javaapi.conversation.lifetime.LifetimeTestCase
>> lifetime2() , T-2243
>> lifetime11() , T-2283
>>
>>
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.vtest.wsbinding.nowsdl.multisoapbindings.GeneratedWSDLTestCase
>> testMultiSoapBindings4() , no associated jira
>>
>>
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.vtest.wsbinding.nowsdl.soapversion.GeneratedWSDLTestCase
>> testSoapVersion4() , no associated jira
>> testSoapVersion5() , no associated jira
>>
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.vtest.wsbinding.WsdlEndpointTestCase
>> testWsdlEndpoint() , no associated jira
>>
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.vtest.wsbinding.WsdlServiceTestCase
>> testWsdlService() , T-2298
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Simon Laws wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy <
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Raymond for pointing this out. We never used this strategy in
>>>>> Geronimo (infact, I have never put any JIRA number in any of the source
>>>>> files other that Release Notes may be). I have come across this in
>>>>> Tuscany
>>>>> source code and have been following it consistently from then on.
>>>>> Should
>>>>> give credit to who ever started this in Tuscany :)
>>>>>
>>>>> ++Vamsi
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I see Vamsi uses the following strategy to disable failing unit test
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> cases.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @Test
>>>>>> @Ignore("TUSCANY-xxxx") // Ignore the test case due to JIRA
>>>>>> TUSCANY-xxxx
>>>>>> public void testMySrtuff() {
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think it's a very good practice we should follow to maintain a clean
>>>>>> build while keep track of the ignored failing test cases with JIRAs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Raymond
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> +1 good idea
>>>>
>>>> Simon
>>>>
>>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Sebastien
>>>
>>>
>>
