Most users who download binary would want samples. Therefore, they will end
up with the same size of package at the end of the road anyway.

It would be nice to have the same distribution across SDO and DAS.

On 5/17/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi,

As ant said, with the binary and samples together the distribution will
follow the other projects' distributions and I think that the binary size
won't be a problem.

Anyway, I think the samples included in the binary wouldn't be clear for
the
downloader where the samples are or  whether there are samples. So, with
the
samples separated would be easier for the downloader to find it.

+1 to keep distribution layout

Adriano Crestani

On 5/17/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In this week DAS release IRC chat [1], Ant had a proposal to change the
> DAS
> distributed artifacts.
>
> We currently have the following distributions :
>    - Source  : have das source implementation (M2)
>    - BInary   : have DAS binaries and all necessary dependencies (M2)
>    - Sample : sample applications in binary form (war) with attached
> source
> code and derby canned database (M2)
>    - Javadoc : DAS implementation javadoc (new after M2)
>
> Ant's proposal would make the distribution layout probably like :
>
>    - Source : DAS source implementation
>    - Binary : have DAS binaries and all necessary dependencies + samples
> binaries and derby canned database + javadoc
>
>
> My personal opinion is that, combining the sample together with the
binary
> distribution would pollute the binary distribution, as the sample
> distribution ship derby canned databases and is currently more then 2
> times
> the size of the binary distribution, without incorporating the new
samples
> done for the current release, but I'm open for the community point of
> view.
> I'm probably ok  to have javadoc distribution incorporated as part of
the
> binary distribution.
>
> Please, express your thoughts..
>
> [1]
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg17832.html
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
>

Reply via email to