Posting to tuscany-user list as well to get input. Any real world scenarios/samples that can be shared by users? It would be great if we could start building a library of tips and real usage examples.. a knowledge base.
Thanks Haleh On 7/2/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/2/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/2/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 7/2/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am looking at the Policy Framework and shall update the wiki on the > > > specifics soon. Once this is done to some level, I'd also like to > help > > a > > > bit with the ws-* things (may be WS-Security to start with) that Ant > has > > > listed on the wiki page. > > > > > > - Venkat > > > > > > On 6/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > With the SCA 0.91 release now being voted on how about starting on > > 0.92? > > > > > > > > I've already been adding some things I'm interested in getting done > to > > > the > > > > next release wiki page - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Java+SCA+Next+Release+Contents- > > > > so far thats mainly related to improving web services functionality. > > > > > > > > So anyone else interested in helping with an 0.92 release or have > any > > > > function they'd like to suggest or add to the wiki page? How does > > aiming > > > > for > > > > getting it done 4 - 6 weeks again sound? > > > > > > > > ...ant > > > > > > > > > > The above link has an extrenuous "-" on the end. Taking that off gets me > > to > > the page. Can we move this information across the to the new wiki space > ( > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Home) so that > > everyone (including non committers) can add to it? > > > > I'm working on the next phase of the distributed runtime which I want to > > get > > into the next release. This involves a few items. > > > > SCA Binding > > Topology model > > Distributed domain > > Node implementation > > Management assembly > > > > Also I need some of the ws items, in particular the ability to run > without > > wsdl, so can help out there. > > > > We need to do something about logging and events to improvide runtime > > usability. We've talked about it before but not done anything yet. Ties > > into > > the management assembly. > > > > I'd also like to see the JMS binding in the release but can't commit to > > doing lots more work on including spec features. It's been working fine > > for > > me in my limited synchronous/rpc model. If I get time I'll take a look > to > > see what it will take to add minimum asynch support but if anyone else > > fancies having a go at this then it's a good way to learn about Tuscany > > extensions. > > > All these sound good, but its starting to sound a lot to get done in just > a > few weeks. How does the suggesting timeframe of 4 or so weeks sound? > > We'd talked once about having a release specifically targeting things like > logging, events, and error handling. I'd still like to do that, if anyone > wants to start now thats great but I doubt I'd have much time to help this > release. > > ...ant > I think 4 weeks is a bit too short. Given that we are getting into holday season I like the sound of 6 weeks better. I agree there is a lot there but in the spirit of your WS list I wasn't proposing that all of it gets done. I do think we need to make a start on the logging/errors sooner rather than later though even if it doesn't get into the next release. I'll offer my effort to help move it along once the distributed work starts drawing to a close. Simon
