How about having an IRC on 4th Feb ,Monday, 7.30 a.m. PST? Please feel free to suggest another time if this is not convenient.
Regards, Amita On Jan 29, 2008 4:55 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was hoping to have done a full pass through the JIRAs to be sure we > cover > the most important ones. Maybe it would be good to schedule an IRC chat > to > get community input on what is important. We could go through each of the > open JIRAs and see how people rate the importance and who would step up to > fixing things. That way we'd get a better picture of what's wanted. When > would be a good time to do this? > > Kelvin. > > On 25/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I have worked on the comments for RAT report and added the results at > the > > end of - > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/RAT+Report. So > > shall > > I go > > ahead and correct the 9 files mentioned there to include Apache header > in > > them? > > > > Also, what is the best way to ensure that the Ex:3rd do contain the > > correct > > license text? > > Any old mail ref. or any other documentation? > > > > Regards, > > Amita > > > > On Jan 18, 2008 5:14 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > Hi Amita, > > > > > > Anything unmarked needs checking to see if it fits one of these > > > categories. I only did the ones I marked up from memory. Ex:IFF > files > > > must > > > me ignored, but it must be clear from the rat report submitted in the > > > release vote that thess files have been left as they are for this > > reason. > > > You can see this kind of thing in Tuscany-1171, and in previous > release > > > vote threads, where the RAT report is manually marked up. > > > > > > Kelvin. > > > > > > > > > On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > What is the action for Ex.IFF - ignore? Also what TBD for the xml > > files > > > > under sdo-tools-test which do not contain headers - i.e. the > > > > last section from RAT Report - Unresolved. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Amita > > > > > > > > On Jan 18, 2008 4:35 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I've marked up the Unresolved section. There's a job to do to be > > sure > > > > > that > > > > > each of the instances marked with Ex:TCR is actually such. We > also > > > need > > > > > to > > > > > work out what to do to take account of the clarification to the > OSOA > > > > > license > > > > > that happened recently, that the files marked Ex:3rd may need to > be > > > > > changed > > > > > to be in line with. > > > > > > > > > > Kelvin. > > > > > > > > > > On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Kelvin, will look at all these points. Also, > > > > > > I used rat-5.0.jar and got the report at - > > > > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/RAT+Report > > > > > > Please see "Unresolved" section in it and give comments about > what > > > is > > > > > > appropriate to fix there. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Amita > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 18, 2008 3:56 PM, kelvin goodson < > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Assuming name of the release as Tuscany SDO Java > > > 1.1-incubatingand > > > > > > > > keeping > > > > > > > > ref. to the > > > > > > > > old mail thread - > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg27168.html. > > > > > > > > I am starting a new thread now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Web Site documentation:- I could gather a few places where > > small > > > > > > updates > > > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > be done. Please give your comments > > > > > > > > if these seem fine or need something more/something else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) why on > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-get-involved.htmlwe > > > > > > > > have - > > > > > > > > Open CSA (SCA Standards) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is confusing and needs investigating. I think you are > > > talking > > > > > > about > > > > > > > the transition from ... > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java.html > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-get-involved.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In which case the "Get Involved" is a link from the "general" > > menu > > > > and > > > > > > > therefore is general to Tuscany. However, the page is > > entitled > > > > "SDO > > > > > > > Java > > > > > > > Get Involved", yet seems identical to the "Get Involved" page > > > from > > > > > the > > > > > > > Tuscany Home page's Community menu apart from the fact that > this > > > > page > > > > > is > > > > > > > entitled "Getting Involved: Apache Tuscany". I'm sure we used > > to > > > > have > > > > > > our > > > > > > > own SDO Java getting involved page, and I think it has > > > accidentally > > > > > > been > > > > > > > overwritten at some stage. I guess we need to look at the > wiki > > > > change > > > > > > > history and see if we can recover it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) changes in > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/tuscany-sdo-java-faq.htmlfor > > > > > > > > new features, improvements > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm a bit confused here. I think maybe you have two separate > > > ideas > > > > > that > > > > > > > have been merged perhaps. I don't think we want to detail new > > > > > features > > > > > > on > > > > > > > the FAQ page. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TUSCANY-1468 - Use HelperContext for scope in Tuscany API > > > > > > > > TUSCANY-1128 - Support attribute and element with same name > > > > > > > > TUSCANY-1359 - New SDOUtil: Upper and lower bound on > > properties > > > > > where > > > > > > > > 'isMany' is true > > > > > > > > CTS TUSCANY-1230 - Improvements to TypeConversionTest > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Something I meant to mention in regards to your other posting > is > > > > that > > > > > > the > > > > > > > CTS is not part of an SDO Java release. We haven't ever > > > "released" > > > > > the > > > > > > > CTS, since it's never yet seemed to make sense to do so. > SDO > > > > > > > implementers > > > > > > > who want to use the CTS can download the source. I think what > > we > > > > want > > > > > > to > > > > > > > do > > > > > > > here is a respin of the kind of release we have done > > before, for > > > > the > > > > > > SDO > > > > > > > Java runtime. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there anything else from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/SDO+Java+Project > > > > > > > > that can be added to it? Also do the above mentioned JIRAs > > > useful > > > > as > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > FAQ, or mention in Release Notes will > > > > > > > > be sufficient? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I see now. Yes, release notes are definitely the place for > > this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/tuscany-sdo-java-faq.htmlpage > > > > > > does > > > > > > > > not have menu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Good point > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4) > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-project-code-structure.htmlno > > > > > > > > menu , old structure > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you are right, we need to add a section for the lib project > and > > > the > > > > > > > tools-test project > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5) http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/getting-source.html no > > menu > > > > and > > > > > > old > > > > > > > > structure > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > again, yes, this doesn't reflect the move of the api project > > into > > > > the > > > > > > > main > > > > > > > sdo trunk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6) developer guide - should we refer to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sca-java-development-guide.htmland > > > > > > > > make SDO Dev Guide more complete? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think ideally we would incorporate some of the new content > > from > > > > the > > > > > > sca > > > > > > > guide into an sdo guide. If the SCA guide is built up by wiki > > > > include > > > > > > > directives, there may be scope for including generic chunks > into > > > out > > > > > own > > > > > > > guide. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 7) > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-user-guide.htmlagain > > > > > no > > > > > > > > menu > > > > > > > > can refer to > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sca-java-user-guide.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8) TUSCANY-1026 > > > > > > > > Also, why > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/distribution/src/main/release/bin/samples/sampleProgramContents.html > > > > > > > > opens the html page without browser rendering it as html? > > (like > > > > > shows > > > > > > > all > > > > > > > > html tags etc.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this is a firefox issue. It's fine in IE. Not sure > why > > > it's > > > > > > wrong > > > > > > > in firefox though. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we provide this link in > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-user-guide.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This looks like a useful rework of some of the content that I > > > think > > > > > is > > > > > > > already in the site. It certainly was at one time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 9) TUSCANY-1531 > > > > > > > > From this - comment #1 - Some pages are only available on > the > > > left > > > > > > menu > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > this page : > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/developing-sdo-java.html > > > > > > > > It should probably be listed/visible from : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-documentation-menu.htmlas > > > > > > > > it's > > > > > > > > one of the pages with more contents on it. > > > > > > > > looks like is fixed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > great > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And with 7) we can fix comment #2 - User guide has wrong > styles > > : > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-user-guide.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fine > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Amita for this useful review. I'll pick some of these > > > things > > > > > up. > > > > > > > Can you let me know which you plan to do and which you would > > like > > > me > > > > > to > > > > > > > do? > > > > > > > Anyone else watching this thread is of course more than > welcome > > to > > > > > pitch > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kelvin. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Amita > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
