Sometimes I suspect XP is the latest 3.11 beta. ;)
On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 01:41:05 -0800, Dick Moores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just saw this on comp.lang.python.announce. > <http://tinyurl.com/5egud> > > I don't understand this. Why is a new version of 2.3 being worked on > after 2.4 has been released? > > I see Tim Peters has said this on python-list: > ===========begin Tim Peters' post=========== > [Brett C] > >> Anthony Baxter, our ever-diligent release manager, mentioned this > past week > >> that Python 2.3.5 will most likely come to fruition some time in January > >> (this is not guaranteed date). > > [Roy Smith] > > Interesting. Does that mean that 2.3 and 2.4 will be maintained in > > parallel for a while? That would be awesome. > > They'll be maintained in parallel through 2.3.5 in January, which is > all Brett said. If history is a guide, after 2.3.5 nobody will > volunteer to work on a 2.3.6, and 2.3.5 will be the last release in > the 2.3 line. It's *possible* that volunteers for 2.3.6 will appear. > That would be unprecedented, but not impossible ... > ============end TP's post================ > > I ask here because I'm sure it's a newbie question. It's got me wondering > if Microsoft is still working on Windows 3.1.. ;-) > > Thanks, > > Dick Moores > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _______________________________________________ > Tutor maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor > -- 'There is only one basic human right, and that is to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, to take the consequences. _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
