Hi Danny,
> That web site (http://thedailywtf.com) is amusing in its way, but my
> problem with it is that so many of the people there enjoy mocking others
> in a mean-spirited and immature way. Programming well is a hard thing.
> The adolescent posturing I see there isn't admirable to me. It's also very
> sad to see that, for any given bad code, there's a lot more really bad
> responses. So my feelings are mixed about it, in the same sort of way
> that I have misgivings toward Slashdot. *grin*
Yes... Slashdot. *shudder*. I've had two of my articles Slashdotted,
and both times it left quite a bruise. If it happens again, I have
resolved to simply not read the comments. Like Othello said, there are
some things we are better off not knowing :)
> It's perfectly ok to take advantage of os.walk(); I like this code.
Excellent. But based on Kent's comment, I have discovered that
------
for root, dirs, files in os.walk(prog_variables['vid_path']):
if dirs == []: print root
------
does the same thing.
Cheers,
--
Seen in the release notes for ACPI-support 0.34:
'The "I do not wish to discuss it" release
* Add workaround for prodding fans back into life on resume
* Add sick evil code for doing sick evil things to sick evil
screensavers'
_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
