Michael Broe said unto the world upon 17/02/06 03:57 PM: <snip>
> Second question. Do I really have to write the sort_print() function > like this: > > def sort_print(L): > L.sort() > print L > > i.e. first perform the operation in-place, then pass the variable? Is > this the idiomatic way of doing it? Hi Michael, others have answered what you asked; I thought I'd try to head off a potential problem for you. Perhaps you've seen this already, but since you are wrapping the print in a function, I suspect you want the original list to be unmodified. Thus, compare: >>> def sort_print1(a_list): a_list.sort() print a_list >>> def sort_print2(a_list): t = list(a_list) t.sort() print t >>> list1 = ["sort_print1", "mutates", "the", "original"] >>> list2 = ["sort_print2", "doesn't", "mutate", "the", "original"] >>> sort_print1(list1) ['mutates', 'original', 'sort_print1', 'the'] >>> list1 ['mutates', 'original', 'sort_print1', 'the'] >>> sort_print2(list2) ["doesn't", 'mutate', 'original', 'sort_print2', 'the'] >>> list2 ['sort_print2', "doesn't", 'mutate', 'the', 'original'] >>> HTH, Brian vdB _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor