Hmm? How so? I'm using a whole lot of raw wxPython mixed with Pythoncard for a project, and the entire process sits at 7Mb RAM usage idle. WinXP btw.
Considering my small command line appns to start/stop Windows services written in C use just over 1Mb, 7Mb isn't overly bad. The other good thing about wxPython is stuff like Pythoncard and Wax, although development on Pythoncard seems to have slowed right down, Kevin Altis got busy, I guess; Wax is nice looking but... not very well documented... It's great being able to use Pythoncard for the not overly complicated stuff, but with the wxPython still lurking beneath the surface. Regards, Liam Clarke On 4/20/06, R. Alan Monroe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If I can get it for free, I might as well go with say wxPython. Thanks > > > Yes, free as in beer, as in speech, and cross platform. Oh, and better > > documented. > > Sadly, you still pay for it in RAM usage :^) > > Alan > > _______________________________________________ > Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor > _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
