Tino Dai wrote:
> How I have it now:
>
> semaA = threading.semaphore()
>
> class nameA:
> def __init__(self):
> <do some stuff>
>
> def run(self):
> <do some stuff>
> semaA.release()
>
> class nameB:
> def __init__(self):
> <do some stuff>
>
> def run(self):
> semaA.acquire()
> <do some stuff>
>
>
> Does that make sense. Or is there a better way?
class nameA:
def __init__(self, sema):
self.sema = sema
<do some stuff>
def run(self):
<do some stuff>
self.sema.release()
class nameB:
def __init__(self, sema):
self.sema = sema
<do some stuff>
def run(self):
self.semaA.acquire()
<do some stuff>
In the client code or the unit test:
semaA = threading.semaphore()
anA = nameA(semaA)
aB = nameB(semaA)
anA.run()
aB.run()
Look, ma, no globals!
Kent
_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
