Am Dienstag, den 07.11.2006, 17:22 +0000 schrieb Alan Gauld: > Apropos of nothing at all... > > "Kent Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > Carroll, Barry wrote: > >> ... consensus was that Python was much better than Ruby > > > > Sounds like you had a table full of Pythonistas. > > And Andreas, Danny and I also argued for Ruby. Please note, that I did not argue for Ruby. I just mentioned, that it's a valid choice, for most purposes where Python is a valid choice and the other way around. And I explained why I feel better with Python for my personal stuff; it doesn't change a thing that we have a mixed Ruby (frontend)/ Python (backend) landscape at the "office".
> And elsewhere Tim making a case for Rebol. > > It just strikes me as interesting that on a Python oriented mailing > list we have people arguing in defence of other languages! This languages are tools. And I guess I know a number of other languages too, despite being a Python guy. ;) Andreas > is not something you see every day on the internet, and indicative > of the nature of the Python community I think. > > :-) > > Alan G. > > _______________________________________________ > Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
