Dave Kuhlman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 11:28:21AM +0000, Tim Golden wrote: >> Kent Johnson wrote: >>> Tim Golden wrote: >>>> field and [EMAIL PROTECTED] in cc: My problem there is that I usually >>>> don't want to send the originating individual a private copy >>>> of an email he/she is going to receive from the list in any >>>> case, so I usually cut-and-paste around so that only the list >>>> is in To: AFAIK, TB doesn't offer any configurability here, >>>> neither a reply-to-list button, nor any option to treat a >>>> list specially on a general reply-to-all. > > MailMan provides an administrative option to remove duplicates: > > "Filter out duplicate messages to list members (if possible)" > > I believe that it is on by default. > > Am I right that, if set, this eliminates your problem?
Thanks very much for that info. Yes, it's not that I've received irate messages from people who've received a message twice! More that it "feels" untidy, but I suspect that you're right and that any real problem is neatly solved by Mailman. >> Thanks for that; (testing it out on this post). My issue is that my >> procmail filter doesn't seem to pick up the list when it's cced. >> But that's for me to sort out it :) > > Maybe a procmail rule something like this: > > :0: > * ^(To|Cc):[EMAIL PROTECTED] > tutor-python-folder > > Note the Cc. I'm actually using the List-Id header: :0: * ^List-Id:.*tutor.python.org IN-lists so I'm surprised it fell through; I would expect the List-Id to appear in the headers anyway. If it happens again, I'll look more closely at the headers. It hasn't yet. Thanks for the hint, though. TJG _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
