Terry Carroll wrote: >> I think that is a good plan, Tkinter is pretty easy to learn but harder >> to use to create polished, high-function interfaces. wxPython comes with >> a lot more in the box. > > I've heard "Tkinter is easier to learn" before, and I think I would once > have agreed. But now that there's a good book on wxPython, I think > wxPython's pretty easy to learn, and is now even better documented than > Tkinter. > > As I was learning wxPython, most of my learning gotchas were noting > differences from the Tkinter approach (including terminology). I think if > I were approaching wxPython with no prior GUI knowledge, it would be > approximately as easy to learn as Tkinter. > > All this is assuming access to a copy of "wxPython in Action"; without the > book, you're back to a dearth of tutorials, and yes, Tkinter would be > easier to learn. I was thinking about finding a copy of that book, so maybe starting WxPython would be easier then and not worry about Tkinter. Is "WxPython in Action" a very good book?
-- Your friend, Scott Sent to you from a Linux computer using Ubuntu Version 7.04 (Feisty Fawn) _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
