Oh i am good with range then, because it's not a real time program.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Shrutarshi Basu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not entirely sure about this, but I think for range(), the entire > range of numbers is generated at one go, which could cause a > slow-down. But xrange() generates the list of numbers one at a time. > For a thousand, there shouldn't be much of a difference, but if you > need a million or so go with xrange() > Basu > _______________________________________________ > Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor >
_______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
