On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Alan Gauld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> <snip> What does nano do that vi (or emacs) doesn't? Given that vi is the > "standard" editor on *nix ity would seem the obvious choice. But everyone > seems to be using nano? Why? AFAIK, it's a little smaller/faster than emacs... but since I'm a vi(m) fan, I'm probably the wrong person for the question ;) -Wayne > > PS. I should explain that I used to use Unix a lot but it was before nano > appeared to proliferate so I never used it. Now I only use *nix occasionally > but nano is everywhere it seems. > > Alan G. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor > -- To be considered stupid and to be told so is more painful than being called gluttonous, mendacious, violent, lascivious, lazy, cowardly: every weakness, every vice, has found its defenders, its rhetoric, its ennoblement and exaltation, but stupidity hasn't. - Primo Levi
_______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor