I just would like to correct my incomplete PyQT pricing list from above and mislead none.
If you intent to write commercial programs you have to pay: 400 EURO for PyQT AND 3000 EURO for QT !!! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:27 PM, andré palma <andre...@gmail.com> wrote: > Neven Goršić wrote: >> >> Thank you all. It was not easy to decide what to learn/use, so I "Google" >> some more. >> >> I have found that PyQT is more stable, faster, more consistent and more >> expensive :). >> 400 EURO is too much for playing around with some GUI, but GPL licence >> resolves that issue. >> The cons are C++ oriented documentation, editor and some structures ... >> >> Neven >> >> --------------- >> >> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:10 AM, johnf <jfabi...@yolo.com >> <mailto:jfabi...@yolo.com>> wrote: >> >> On Wednesday 04 March 2009 04:56:37 pm Alan Gauld wrote: >> > "Kent Johnson" <ken...@tds.net <mailto:ken...@tds.net>> wrote >> > >> > > I've heard good things about Dabo, never tried it myself though. >> > > http://dabodev.com/ >> > >> > I looked at Dabo but decided not to try it since it was yet another >> > framework. Although it's based on wxPython they have layered their >> > own widgets on top which is what the GUI Builder uses. (PythonCard >> > fell into the same hole) >> >> Yes, it's true that Dabo has wrapped (subclassed) most of the >> controls. The >> purpose of course was to provide developer ease of use. If you >> are building >> a real business app then I doubt there is anything better in the >> python >> world. I personally have used both VB and Delphi and see Dabo on >> the same >> level. With one exception - we have a beta GUI builder. >> Everything that has >> been done in Dabo is the very same things that all developers would be >> required to do if they access a database and associate fields to >> controls. >> BTW there is nothing stopping a Dabo developer from directly using wx >> controls. Dabo prevents nothing. >> >> So Alan, I don't see my work as falling into any hole. >> > >> > But the web pages and writeup looked good and the forum seemed >> > to be active and not all negative. >> > >> > Alan G >> > >> Hey, i've found your discussion interesting. >> > I'm developing my final course project and i'm using a toll called "Glade" > to create my application. It has a IDE that let you to create your windows, > with text boxes, combo boxes ... everything! And the really good thing: it > is totally open source =) > It's quit simple to do applications with glade. You just have to create your > GUI with it IDE and then you just need to link the "signals" to de functions > that actually preform actions. > > GLADE: > http://glade.gnome.org/ > http://www.pygtk.org/articles/pygtk-glade-gui/Creating_a_GUI_using_PyGTK_and_Glade.htm > (examples how to use glade and pyGTK) > > and if you look for it in youtube there is a lot of a good video tutorials > >> >> -- >> John Fabiani >> _______________________________________________ >> Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org <mailto:Tutor@python.org> >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor >> > > _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
