John [H2O] wrote:
>
>
> spir wrote:
>>
>> What you're looking for is a dictionary...
>> s = {"cheese":"Brie", "country":"France", ...}
>>
>> Or maybe a kind of object type that works ~ like a dict, but with object
>> syntax (get rid of {} and "" for keys). Example:
>>
>> class Stuff(object):
>> def __iter__(self):
>> return iter(self.__dict__.items())
>> def items(self):
>> return self.__dict__
>>
>> stuff = Stuff()
>> stuff.cheese="Brie"
>> stuff.country="France"
>> print stuff.cheese, stuff.country
>> print stuff.items()
>> for st in stuff:
>> print " ", st
>> ==>
>> Brie France
>> {'cheese': 'Brie', 'country': 'France'}
>> ('cheese', 'Brie')
>> ('country', 'France')
>>
>>
>> Denis
>> ------
>> la vita e estrany
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
>>
>>
>
>
> Denis,
>
> This is working, but what would be ideal is to have 'best of both' worlds.
> Is there a way to combine this class with a dict, so that I can do both:
If you want to control attribute access, override its __getattr__ and
__setattr__.
If you want to make a dict lookalike, override its __getitem__ and
__setitem__ or inherit from dict.
Knowing this, you can do this:
class SuperDict(dict):
def __getattr__(self, attr):
return self[attr]
def __setattr__(self, attr, value):
self[attr] = value
>>> S = SuperDict()
>>> S.foo = 42
>>> S['bar'] = 100
>>> S.bar
100
>>> S['foo']
42
>>> S.items()
[('foo', 42), ('bar', 100)]
>>> S['this'] = 'is great'
>>> S.this
'is great'
>>> S.this = 'is even better'
>>> S['this']
'is even better'
_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
