On Sep 26, 2009, at 11:42 PM, Alan Gauld wrote:
"Kent Johnson" <ken...@tds.net> wrote
It appears to be
http://openbookproject.net/thinkCSpy/ch04.html
So it is, Thats a shame CSpy is one of my favourite "competitors" :-)
Pity it's apparently encouraging the use of eval like this with no
caveat.
But to the OP, keep with it, its not a bad tutorial, shame about
this exercise!
Perhaps worth alerting the author? He's a nice guy and i e-mailed him
many moons ago when i was working through that book with some concerns
i had. He was really receptive and grateful to get feed back and was
quick to make changes if he thought they would improv the text. A
super good dude and it seems, a top notch educator. He tends to credit
*everyone* who sends in a suggestion, no matter how minor.
_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
