On 12/22/2010 10:32 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Karim, 22.12.2010 22:09:
Using lxml (except for the different import) will be fully compliant
with
the ET code.
Do I have to adapt it?
There are certain differences.
http://codespeak.net/lxml/compatibility.html
This page hasn't been changed for ages, but it should still be mostly
accurate.
I will have a look. Anyway, I must delivered my current version.
I got 300 lines of codes which should be easily translated for
the improved future version.
I saw your fantastic benchmarks! Why the hell lxml is not integrated
into
the stdlib.
I thought they put in it things which works at best for python
interest ?
I proposed it but it was rejected with the argument that it's a huge
dependency and brings in two large C libraries that will be hard to
control for future long-term maintenance. I think that's a reasonable
objection.
One can never says never...
They will reconsider it I think.
Thanks for your support!
Regards
Karim
_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist - [email protected]
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
