On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Alan Gauld <[email protected]>wrote:
C++ grew out of C so it has a lot of non OOP features. It is no > surprise to find therefore that its primitive types are related to > memory allocation and raw data rather than objects. > > No object is standard in OOP. It is a concept. It is the instantiated > encapsulation of data and function. How it is created varies between > language implementations. Well, that clears it up! I guess Python is a wider implementation of OOP, hence a wider use of objects. Thanks a lot. On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Walter Prins <[email protected]> wrote: > Object Oriented code in e.g. a procedural language like C, which obviously > doesn't support the notion of objects explicitly in the language, although > then it's up to you to come up with conventions and infrastructure to > support the concept of object orientation in your program. Didn't know that! It's interesting that GObject is itself written in C, which is a procedural laguage.. -- Regards, Ashwini
_______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
