On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Tino Dai wrote:
Hi! I have a question about style. In PEP-8, it says don't exceed 79 characters, but can this rule ever be trumped by readability?
PEP 8 is style guidelines, not hard and fast rules or they wouls be syntax errors. But that would just be annoying, so yes, there are cases where you would want to extend...
Eg. if someobject.filter(something) \ .filter(somethingreallyreallyreallyreallylong == somethingelsereallyreallylong) \ .filter(othethingreallylongreallyreally == ternarythingreallyreallyreallylong) \ .filter(thirdthingreallylessreallymaybelong == thirdotherthingreallylong) \ .first(): < do something > if someobject.filter(something) \ .filter(somethingreallyreallyreallyreallylong == \ somethingelsereallyreallylong) \ .filter(othethingreallylongreallyreally == \ ternarythingreallyreallyreallylong ) \ .filter(thirdthingreallylessreallymaybelong == \ thirdotherthingreallylong) \ .first(): < do something > The first example is more readable to me but violates the 80 character rule. The second is less readable, but doesn't violate the 80 character rule.
This is exactly what the style guide is meant to help. Regardless of which format you chose here I would tell you that both ways are wrong. The right way is to fix your algorithm (how you solve the problem) so you don't have to have such an insane amount of code on one line. Of course this isn't a hard and fast rule either, but I'd say about 99% of the time a lot of nesting or chaining indicates a broken flow (even if the logic is100% accurate).
Is there a guideline or convention that pythonistas follow about this style case?
Refactor! hth, Wayne
_______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
