On 07/07/2012 09:34, Alan Gauld wrote:
On 07/07/12 04:35, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I find it ironic that you are suggesting removing the debugger to make
it easier to debug the code :)
But the pdb.trace() calls are not needed for debugging. The
interactive debugger will work just fine without them.
They are for very specialised use. (ie I've never found
a need for them! ;-)
I'd either add some more print statements or I'd run it inside a
debugger.
Which is what pdb is :)
Yes but it doesn't need the trace() calls to use it and
winpdb (or even IDLE) is much easier to use!
Nevertheless, if the Original Poster is not actually using the debugger,
he should remove the debugger calls.
And that really was the point I was making.
I don't use a debbuger much but when I do winpdb is superb.
--
Cheers.
Mark Lawrence.
_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
