On 04/12/12 00:55, Spectral None wrote:
From:"[email protected]" <[email protected]> To:[email protected] Sent: Sunday, 2 December 2012, 17:34 Subject: Tutor Digest, Vol 106, Issue 5Send Tutor mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Tutor digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: reverse diagonal (Dave Angel) 2. To Find the Answers (Sujit Baniya) 3. Re: To Find the Answers (Dave Angel) 4. Re: reverse diagonal (Steven D'Aprano) 5. 1 to N searches in files (Spectral None) 6. Re: 1 to N searches in files (Steven D'Aprano)
Okay, this is where I stopped reading. You should pay attention to the emails that other people are sending. Notice how they reply to individual emails, not to a mass digest? Then pay attention to *your* email. Imagine you were receiving it. Did you not notice that your reply was SIX PAGES LONG? Can you imagine if everyone did what you just did? The first reply would be six pages, then the reply to that would be 12 pages, the reply to that would be 24 pages, then 48 pages... If you want a response to your question, please try again. This time: - only reply to a SINGLE email at a time, not six; - only quote the parts of the email that are relevant; - use a meaningful subject line that summarizes your question. If you don't do these things, you will soon find that nobody will be interested in digging through the piles and piles of dross looking for your comments buried deep in your reply. [snipped 200-odd lines] -- Steven _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
