On 2013-08-06 18:36, Dave Angel wrote: > This version should be a bit cleaner than what I've seen on this thread.
Our methods are almost the same, other than the fact that you don't use a generator, and you do the length validity check during the loop instead of preemptively, I'm not sure which I think is cleaner. I'm more inclined toward using more lines of code to clearly express the reason for the failure's conclusion, but either is perfectly valid and readable. Thanks for the alternative :-) On 2013-08-06 18:36, Dave Angel wrote: > BTW, you have a bunch of other messages on the thread which are replying > to the invisible man, posts that aren't (yet?) visible. Since you quote > him without attribution, we have no clue who you're commenting about. He is replying to me, but his client seems to not prepend any header to his quotes. I am new to this list and am still held in the moderation queue. Chris
pgpDLqAd47rSw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
