On 19/01/14 23:36, SM wrote:
I read about os.popen in http://docs.python.org/2/library/subprocess.html#subprocess.Popen
This doesn't answer the question but I'm curious. If you read about os.popen in the subprocess module docs why did you use it? The subprocess module replaces all the os.popen calls with the generally superior subprocess.Popen class. Now, I don't know if using subprocess instead of os would fix things in this case but it seems an odd choice? I'm curious why you chose to go with os.popen? BTW you don't tell us which OS you are using (or which Python version), that may be pertinent to the answer. I'm assuming it's some variant of *nix but which one? -- Alan G Author of the Learn to Program web site http://www.alan-g.me.uk/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/alangauldphotos _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
