On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:05 AM, eryksun <eryk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Generally you'll make `__iter__` a generator, so you don't have to > worry about implementing `__next__`. Also, the built-in function > `next` was added in 2.6, so you don't have to worry about the method > name difference between 2.x and 3.x, either.
Yes, the exercise was about implementing an iter incorrectly, to see the difference. But I don't really understand your second point: when I changed the method name, it worked...? -- Keith _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
