On Saturday, April 19, 2014, Vipul Sharma wrote: > Hello, > > Suppose we want some block of code to be executed when both '*a'* and > '*b'*are equal to say 5. Then we can write like : > > *if a == 5 and b == 5:* > * # do something* > > But a few days ago, I just involuntarily wrote a similar condition check as > > > *if a == b and b == 5:* > * # do something * > > which made me think, is there any difference between the two ?
Transitivity is one factor, but another one I don't think got mentioned is short-circuiting. When two conditions are joined by an "and" or an "or", sometimes only the first condition is actually executed, if the result is sufficient to determine the outcome. If the first condition of an "or" is True, then the result must be True, and no further computation is necessary. For "and", if the first condition is False, then the outcome must be False, and evaluation of the other condition does not occur. Most of the time, this doesn't matter. But if the expressions are expensive to compute, or contain "side effects", it can become significant. Side effects are things computations do that have some effect beyond the immediate result. Print statements are familiar examples. Changing an internal variable in a class instance is another. Cheers _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
