Hi, The reason I opened a link is because there are changes in the code. Does it make sense? Else I can definitely go back to the thread.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Danny Yoo <d...@hashcollision.org> wrote: > Hi Suhana, > > Also note that you asked this question just a few days ago. > > https://mail.python.org/pipermail/tutor/2014-April/101019.html > > We're not robots. We don't like repetition unless there's a reason > for it, and in this case, you got responses to the earlier question. > For example: > > https://mail.python.org/pipermail/tutor/2014-April/101022.html > https://mail.python.org/pipermail/tutor/2014-April/101029.html > > Did you see these responses? If not, please check your mail settings. > > > If you want to continue working on this problem, I'd recommend > continuing that thread rather than start a fresh one. Reason is, if I > were to look at your question fresh, I'd answer the exact same way to > it. I'm trying to lightly probe what you've done and what you > understand already. > > If you're repeating the question in the hopes that repetition will > wear down the people you're trying to get answers from, please change > your learning strategy: it won't be effective here. >
_______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
