On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 09:51:39PM +0530, Arup Rakshit wrote: > Here, why super(Role, self).__init__(**kwargs) is used instead of > super().__init__(**kwargs) ? What that Role and self argument is > instructing the super() ?
The Role and self arguments are the owning class and current instance. They are always required, but in Python 2 you needed to provide them yourself, and it was error-prone. So in Python 3, the interpreter was modified to do the right thing when super is called with no arguments. super() still accepts manual arguments, and in fact the signature is quite complex: class super(object) | super() -> same as super(__class__, <first argument>) | super(type) -> unbound super object | super(type, obj) -> bound super object; requires isinstance(obj, type) | super(type, type2) -> bound super object; requires issubclass(type2, type) but any use other than plain old super(Class, self) in Python 2 or super() in Python 3 is considered rather advanced. -- Steven _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
