On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 11:05:42 +0200, David Bourgeois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 21:52:32 +0200, neimad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I started "fixing" function comments by making them use doxygen
syntax, and I noticed that we currently have doxygen comments using
both "\" and "@" styles:
\param[in] toto Stuff
@param[in] titi More stuff
I may be partly responsible for this, being accustomed to using "\" at
work while Tux droïd's code was using "@" (IIRC) where there were dox
comments (not many ;-)).
It's not important but I like consistency, and I think we should
choose one or the other ("@" pleases my eyes more, but I don't really
mind).
Damien
I used \param in the (few documented) firmware functions so we can go
with
that if we're all used to it.
I didn't notice you already added a couple of @param, it really doesn't
matter for me which one we choose. Just go on and I'll follow.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
tux-droid-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tux-droid-user
